Tuesday, May 5, 2015

800 B.C Asclepius will heal your asthma, part 2

Buck explains that the person would lie down, usually wrapped in coat of a Ram , and then drift off to sleep. (8, page 62)  The god Asclepius would then enter the hostel, remove your skull , and take out the demons.  When you woke up you'd either have an epiphany regarding the cure, or the priest would tell you the cure the god recommended.

Actually, Garrison said that once the patient fell asleep the priests would dress like the god.  If the patient was asleep the remedy would occur to the patient.  If necessary the patient would tell the priests what he dreamed of, and the priests would interpret them, thus relaying the cure.  Some patients would not sleep, and they would come face to face with the god, who would directly relay the cure. The god may either appear as a vision, or he may have actually been one of the priests in disguise.  (7, page 76)

Watson said the temples were:
"Always filled with patients; and along their walls the tablets (votive tablets) were suspended upon which were recorded the history and treatment of the individual cases of disease." (5, page 27)
Neuburger said the votive tablets were made of wood or stone, "and hung up on posts or pillars." (13, page 95)

As the patient's slept, the priests would review the complaints of the patients, and perhaps assess them vaguely.  This information was then used for divination purposes, where the priests would make both a diagnosis and prognosis.  The priests would then refer to the votive tablets for the cure.  (2, page 57)

In looking at the votive tablets, the priests would look for similar diseases. enouard explained the reasoning behind this system:
These persons have constantly in their mouths these words: “ I have seen a disease similar to this cured by such a remedy.” Their reasoning, however gross it appears to us, is based on an incontestable principle, that may be stated as follows: Remedies which have cured a disease, must be equally efficacious in curing analogous cases. (9, page 70)
As noted by Neuburger above, this was mainly done to offer hope to the sick.

Renouard said this was a system similar to that of the ancient Egyptians.  He said the votive tablets "showed the names of the patient, the kind of disease with which he was attacked, and the manner of the cure." (9, page 67)

Renouard said that one votive tablet was found in Rome on the island of Tiber, the site of an ancient Asclapion temple.  He quoted the following from one of these tablets:
"Lately a certain Carus, who was blind, came to consult the oracle. The god required that he approach the sacred alter to perform adorations; at once he passed from the right to the left, and having rested his fingers on the altar, he raised his hand and applied them to his eyes. He recovered his sight immediately, in the presence of the people, who rejoiced to see such marvels accomplished under the reign of our august Antonius." (9, page 67)
“Lucius was attacked with a pleurisy, and every one despaired of his life. The god ordered that the ashes of the altar be taken, mingled with wine and applied to his side. He was saved, and gave thanks to god before the people, who congratulated him.” (9, page 67)
“Julian vomited blood, and appeared lost beyond recovery. The oracle ordered him to take the pine seeds of the altar and eat them for three days, mingled with honey. He did so, and was cured. Having solemnly thanked god, he went away.”
“The god gave this direction to a blind soldier named Valerius Aper: Take the blood of a white cock, mingle it with honey, and make acollyrium, which you are to apply to the eyes for three days. The soldier having fulfilled the direction of the oracle, was restored to sight, and returned to make a public thanksgiving to God.”
The tablets were reviewed by the priests when their memories did not allude to a similar case and a cure. (9 page 67).

These tablets were studied by the priests, particularly when they were in training, and were later studied by students of philosophy in schools (gymnasiums) that were attached to the Asclepions.

Neuburger said:
Asclepios enjoined mostly natural cures, such as diet, exercise... hunting, or fencing, also physical means -- listening to song, seeing a play -- less often bleeding or purgatives, at times seemingly ridiculous but really suggestive measures. Success was always ascribed to the credit of the god, failure to the fault of the patient."
Osler said the priests "did not neglect the natural means of healing.  The inscriptions show that great attention was paid to diet, exercise, massage and bathing, and that when necessary, drugs were used."  (2, page 57)

Most of the drugs used were generally to cleanse and purify the body.  Garrison said some common drugs were cathartics (purgatives), emetics, or bleeding.  (7, page 76) Other drugs that may have been used were diaphoretics, stimulants, and sedatives.  

Most drugs consisted of a variety of herbs prepared into pills made of dough that were taken orally or through the rectum.  Some remedies were made into drinks such as wine.    

Sigerist said the rich gave expensive gifts and sacrifices, and the poor gave what they could. Some slept in the temples and some in nearby hostels hoping to be cured by the god in the night.   If you had asthma perhaps you were among the crowd sleeping on the floors.  Or, in your case, slumped over a chair yearning to fall asleep to learn how to get your breath back. (1, page 73 and 3)

Neuburger said the "hostels (shelters) were "undertaken by the keepers of inns and boarding-houses in the neighbourhood." (13, page 94)

Garrison said if you did get better, an offering of thanks, which often included a wax model of the "diseased part," was presented to the god, and the story recorded on the votive tablets for future priests to reference.  (7, page 76)

Some speculate that at some point during the life of the Asclepions medicine was transformed in Greece from mythology and theology to natural philosophy and reason (an early form of science), but at exactly what point this occurred, and how many cases were seen prior to this transformation, are unknown. (9, page 68, 76)

That medicine was practiced at the Asclepions, as opposed in some remote location among the populace, is what allowed medicine to advance.  It is only out of this system, as Renouard quotes Louis Philippe Auguste Gauthier from his 1844 book "Recherches Historiques sur l’Exercice de la Médicine dans les Temples,”
It must be agreed, that in those barbarous times, medicine could make more progress in the hands of a corporation like the Asclepiadae, than if it had been merely a domestic or popular art.  It is not probable that, at a period so remote, when the arts and sciences were still in their infancy, a man of genius could be suddenly raised up, who could elevate medicine to the rank of a science... It is probable that the reading of the inscription in the temples, and the habit of seeing a great number of sick, gave, in the end, a certain amount of medical instruction to the priests." (9, page 76)
Initially this knowledge was esoteric to only the priests of the Asclepions, although, over time, the priests at Cos preferred a more rational approach to medicine. This rational medicine ultimately gave rise to the physicians who worked outside the Asclepions.  (13, page 96)

Sometimes around 400 B.C. a famous physician named Hippocrates, the so called man of genius, transcribed the votive tablets at the temple of Cos into the infamous Hippocratic Corpus, or so some speculate

By writing the Corpus, Hippocrates not only helped complete the transformation of medicine in Greece, he also made this knowledge available to the public.  It was for these reasons, as we will learn later, why Hippocrates will forever be known as the father of medicine.

In the meantime, many historians have noted that ancient Greece was well ahead of other ancient societies in regards to medicine.  The best evidence of this is the accumulated knowledge obtained from the votive tablets stored in the Asclepions. Of this, Meryon said:
"And this opinion appears to be supported by the fact that from the earliest time of which any historic record exists, the Hellenic physicians were in high repute at the court of Babylon; so that, although the origin of Grecian medicine is involved in the most profound obscurity, the resources at the Asclepiades were obviously appreciated over and above the appliances of the Persians, which were chiefly derived from astrology and magic." (6, page 20)
While some may think of such "asylums" as the first hospitals, Watson notes this wasn't necessarily true.  He said:
"The temples bore no inapt resemblance to the hospitals and infirmaries of modern times; into which, in fact, some of them were ultimately converted. (5, page 26)
Thomas Bradford, in his 1898 book "Quiz questions on the history of medicine," said the Asclepions were, however, converted into hospitals when Constantinople made Catholicism the official religion of Rome in 312 A.D.  It was Helena, the mother of Constantine, who was the primary champion for this conversion. (12, page 49)

Even after their demise, even after the glorious physicians of the Grecian era were long gone, the sick could still travel to the Asclepions for health and healing. Even as the medicine was transformed from philosophy back to theology, at least the sick were offered the best mode of treatment in the ancient and primitive worlds, and that was hope.

  1. Sigerist, Henry E, "A History of Medicine," 1961 edition, Volume II: Early Greek, Hindu, Persion Medicine," Oxford University Press, page 44
  2. Osler, William, "The Evolution of Modern Medicine: A series of lectures at Yale University on the Silliman Foundation in April, 1913," New Have, Yale University Press, 1921,
  3. Templesuk.org, "Asclepius," http://healing.templesuk.org/asclepius.htm
  4. Withington, Edward Theodore, "Medical History from the Earliest Times," 1894, London
  5. Watson, John, "the Medical Profession in Ancient Times," 1856, New York, 
  6. Meryon, Edward, "The History of Medicine: Comprising a narrative of its progress from the earliest ages to the prestne and of the delusions incidental to its advance from empericism to the dignity of a science," volume I, London, 1861
  7. Garrison, Fielding Hudson, "An introduction to the history of medicine," 1922, 3rd edition, Philadelphia and London, W.B. Saunders and Company
  8. Buck, Albert Henry, Williams Memorial Public Funds, "The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800," 1917, London, Oxford University Press
  9. Renouard, Pierre-Victor, "A History of Medicine from its origin to the nineteenth century," 1867, Philadelphia, Lindsay and Blakiston
  10. Bradford, Thomas Lindsley, "Quiz questions on the history of medicine: form the lectures of Thomas Lindsley Bradford, M.D," 1898, Philadelphia
  11. Strathern, Paul, "A Brief History of Medicine from Hippocrates to Gene Therapy," 2005, U.K. Avalon Publishing
  12. Bradford, Thomas Lindsley, writer, Robert Ray Roth, editor, “Quiz questions on the history of medicine from the lectures of Thomas Lindley Bradford M.D.,” 1898, Philadelphia, Hohn Joseph McVey
  13. Neuburger, Max, writer, "History of Medicine," 1910, translated by Ernest Playfair, Volume I, London, Oxford University Press
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

No comments:

Post a Comment