|Figure 1 -- Bouchut's Endotracheal Tube|
(23, page 6)
Obviously, in order to stay alive people must continue breathing. By 1830 physicians were well aware of this fact. This was important for victims of near drownings, and for patients who required anaesthetics during complicated surgeries. During these times, some method of artificial resuscitation was required, or some means of breathing for the these patients, at least until they regained their ability to spontaneously breathe.
How do people inhale? Natural inhalation occurs when the muscles of inspiration constrict, thus pulling the chest wall outward. This creates a negative pressure inside the chest resulting in air being drawn (sucked) into the lungs.
How do people exhale? Natural exhalation occurs when the muscles of inspiration relax, thus causing the chest wall to naturally recoil. This creates a positive pressure inside the chest resulting in air being forced out of the lungs.
Negative Pressure Ventilators mimic the natural means of inhaling. The patient is placed inside a tank that creates a negative pressure that draws the chest outward, thus causing inhalation. The problem with these machines is that they made it so that it was difficult to gain access to the patient. This problem was resolved with positive pressure ventilation.
Positive pressure ventilation essentially involves forcing inhalation by creating a positive pressure. The most primitive, and most basic, form of positive pressure ventilation is mouth to mouth breathing. Another mean is to provide positive pressure by using a mask. A modern name for this is noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, although this term would not be introduced to the medical profession for another 150 years.
By the 1830s, the medical profession was well aware of the importance of breathing. They had some methods of manual resuscitation, although most of these required more than one person to perform, were time consuming, and were exhausting. None could be performed for any length of time.
An added concern of these methods is that they involved moving the patient's arms and legs, risking injury to the body. They also did not guarantee that a patient was receiving an adequate tidal volume. So the need arose for some mechanical apparatus to provide artificial resuscitation.
That said, the need had arisen for a mechanical apparatus to provide, or at least assist, with artificial resuscitation. Ideally it would be something that would eliminate the risk of breaking arms and legs, would provide an adequate tidal volume with a low pressure, and would reduce or eliminate the need for manual power.
1832: Dalzeil respirator: In 1832, Scottish physician John Dalzeil described what many refer to as the precursor to negative pressure ventilators that would follow, including the Woillez Iron lung which is described below. (16) It was essentially the first known example of noninvasive negative pressure ventilation.
It was a box, and he once used it to ventilate a man who was a near drowning victim. The patient sat up while in the box with his head and arms outside the box. The box was airtight, and bellows inside caused a negative pressure that caused inspiration.(16)
A window on the outside of the box allowed an observer to see if it was actually causing respirations. This is often referred to as the first tank respirator, or the first iron lung. The box had to have been hand powered, and there is no documentation it actually worked. (16)
1845: Oxygen breaths Of course another thing that physicians learned early on was the importance of making sure a patient is getting enough oxygen while artificial breaths were being performed. A man named Erichson invented the first device that provided positive pressure breaths with oxygen through a cannula inserted through a pipe inserted into one of the nostrils. He recommended ten breaths a minute.
1858: Bouchut's Intubation Tube: The noninvasive methods of providing positive pressure ventilation were not effective long term. The negative pressure ventilators were fine, although they usually consisted of large, bulky tanks that made gaining access to the patient difficult. So another means was needed to provide artificial resuscitation long term.
So this inspired early experiments with inserting hollow tubes into the airway. This is considered to be invasive. So, from here on out, anytime a person needs to have a tube inserted into their airway to provide resuscitation, it is referred to as invasive ventilation.
Earlier physicians tried using a catheter, but this wasn't very effective. In 1858, French physician Eugene Bouchut (1841-1898) became the first to describe insertion of a tube into the airway as opposed to a catheter in a case of dyspnea. The tube he used during seven cases between 1856-1858 (24, page 661-662) was a rounded silver tube narrower at the end to be inserted as you can see in Figure 1, and it was 1.5 to 2 cm long and 7 cm in diameter.
Interestingly, a silk thread was attached to the distal end of the tube that was "brought out to the mouth, and was intended to prevent the tube from going down the trachea or esophagus; and to allow it to be taken out when necessary."
He later "insisted on the distinction between his method and catheterism." However, of the seven cases he cited to the French Academy of Medicine, only two lived and both required tracheotomy. Yet he proved the procedure could be done.
Various other physicians described success with this or similar procedures between 1858 and 1880 when Joseph O'Dwyer (see below) introduced a more effective tube. (see figure 1)(23, page 5)
1875: Blake cures poison victim: Using a device similar to Richardson's Bellows, Blake connected a reservoir of condensed oxygen to it and treated a case of acute poisoning with success. Before this time artificial respiration (often referred to as insufflation) was used mainly to treat neonatal asphyxia, but now the focus was also on treating adults. The nozzle of the device was inserted into the nostril.
1876: Woillez Iron Lung (Spirophone): While the iron lung wasn't mass produced until the late 1920s, there were some earlier models that acted as prototypes of later designs. In fact, the design described by Woilliz was quite similar to the Drinker and Shaw and Emerson iron lungs. The only drawback to Woillez's design was he didn't have access to electricity, so his machine was powered by hand.
"(The apparatus is) a zinc or sheet iron cylinder large enough to receive the body of an adult up to the neck. It is equipped with wheels which permit moving it rapidly to the place where it is necessary. The cylinder set almost horizontal slightly inclined is hermetically closed at the boot end and open at the head end. Through this opening at the head end you slide the body of the patient by means of a sort of stretcher equipped with rollers, on which he is previously placed; then you close the head opening around his neck by means of a diaphragm that you attach to the edges of the opening. The head thus remaining free rests on an appropriate support. A flexible impermeable fabric attached to the cover diaphragm is secured around the neck to avoid as far as possible the passage of exterior air to the inside of the apparatus, at the moment when the vacuum is produced there.
The air thus confined in the apparatus around the body of the patient can be partially rapidly withdrawn by means of a powerful aspirator bellows of about 20 litres capacity actuated by means of a lever. The interior of this pump communicates with the interior of the apparatus through a large tube tightly screwed on." (17)There were other similar designs, yet none became mass producible mainly due to lack of knowledge of electricity at the time.
Yet this didn't meet his satisfaction so he devised a tube to be placed into the larynx where it would remain. By trial and error he tinkered with the device until it met his satisfaction. The device was made with a bivalve tube with a narrow transverse diameter, and about an inch long."
A shoulder on the upper end prevented the tube from slipping down. By trial and error the tube transformed so the tube was a "plain tube of elliptical form about an inch in length." He then played with longer tubes until he found the desired length. The final tube used was made of brass and lined with gold, and was accepted by the medical community. (See figures 2 and 3.)
A complete set was included in a box, that included sizes for different aged children, an obturator, an introducer, an extractor, and a gag. The length of the tubes in inches were 1.5, 1 3/4, 2, 2.25 and 2.5. The obturator of the physicians choice is connected to the end of the introducer, and this is used to insert the tube. If necessary a small thread could be inserted and tied to a hole on the outer edge of the tube to prevent it from going down the trachea, and to facilitate removal.
The kit also came with a scale (see figure 5) which helped the physician determine appropriate depth of the tube according to age. The scale is used like this: "The smallest tube reaches line 1, and is intended for children about one year and under. The next reaches line 2, and is for children between one and two years. The third size, marked 34 on the scale, should be used between two and four years. The fourth, marked 5-7, is for the next three years, and the largest tube is for children from eight to twelve."
O'Dwyer also designed larger tubes and equipment for adult intubation. (23, page 9-18)
|O'Dwyer's introducer connected to obturator (23, page 16)|
1888: Foot operated Bellows
Dr. George Fell invented a system of bellows whereby the operator would use his hands to provide positive pressure breaths. He would either use a tracheotomy or face mask. In 1891 this system was revised by Joseph O'Dwyer of New York so that breaths were provided by pressing down on a lever with your foot. O'Dwyer preferred to connect his bellow system to an endotracheal tube. O'Dwyer was concerned about over-distention of the lungs due not allowing enough time for expiration, and therefore recommended giving slow breaths, or 10-12 per minute. (21, page 283)
1891: Concerns of Intubation: By the late 19th century many of the same concerns physicians have today about intubation were considered. One such concern being the ulceration of tissue due to pressure of the tube set upon it for a long period of time. Tubes were generally taken out after six days with success, although in some cases were left in 12 days or longer. Dr. Rank, a German physician, ultimately recommended removal of the tube after 10 days, and if necessary, the physician should consider tracheotomy.
Some physicians recommended extubation after the 5th day, which would be in line with modern protocols. Feeding the patient was also a concern, and was either done with soft foods or liquids, or by nasalgastric tube. It was recommended that if the tube was accidentally spit up that the nurse take advantage of the moment to try feeding the patient prior to re-introducing the tube (if the tube was still needed). (23, page 29-20)
1898 Matas's Apparatus for Artificial Respiration: Around this time the need arose for a means to prevent asphyxia when chloroform was used. There was also the concern of preventing pneumothorax during artificial respiration. Matas deviced the "experimental automatic respiratory apparatus" as you can see in figure 4.
This was never put in use on a real patient, and was mainly used to study the effects of pressure during inspiration and expiration. You can see some of the major components in the picture: MF = O'Dwyer intubating cannula and stopcock for introducing chloroform; M = Mercurial manometer to measure pressure or vacuum; H is the handle to work the pump and forces air into the lungs. The operator placed a finger over a hole in the O'Dwyer intubation cannula, and when he removed his finger expiration occured. (R = Rubber tubing.)
It was quite a contraption for its time. Experiments were performed on dogs and human cadavers, although it was decided it was not fit for use on humans. (See figure 4) (21, page 284)
|Figure 4 (21)|
1900: Cuffed Endotracheal Tubes and laryngoscopes
Right around the turn of the century was when the furst cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETT) started showing up. This was necessary to prevent air from leaking around the tube so that bigger breaths could be given, and it also worked nice to prevent aspiration around the tube.
Another problem was how to insert the tube into the ETT into the airway. Blind insertion meant there was a risk of intubating the esophagus, which, if not recognized, resulted in asphyxia and death.
A laryngoscope is a device that allowed the doctor to open the airway in order to see the vocal cords and glottis. This increased the likelihood of tracheal intubation.
A larygoscope was first described in 1855 using sunlight to see the vocal cords, and by 1913 a battery powered laryngoscope with an external light was invented. This was refined so it had a handle with a battery and a light bulb at the end of the scope for easy visualization of the vocal cords. (18)
- 4000 B.C. - 1800: Evolution of Artificial Respiration
- 1800-1900: The Beginning of Pressure Therapy
- 1800-1900: The Beginning of Pressure Therapy (part II)
- Szmuk, Peter, eet al, "A brief history of tracheostomy and tracheal intubation, from the Bronze Age to the Space Age," Intensive Care Medicine, 2008, 34, pages 222-228
- Price, J.L., "The Evolution of Breathing Machines," (this must have been written in the 1950s or early 1960s because the last reference was to IPPB being used as a respirator) (reference to The Bible, Kings, 4: 34)
- Tan, S.Y, et al, "Medicine in Stamps: Paracelsus (1493-1541): The man who dared," Singapore Medical Journal, 2003, vol. 44 (1), pages 5-7
- "Resuscitation and Artificial Respiration," freewebs.com, Scientific Anti-Vivisectionism, http://www.freewebs.com/scientific_anti_vivisectionism4/resuscitation.htm, accessed March 1, 2012
- Price, op cit
- Lee, W.L., A.S. Stutsky, "Ventilator-induced lung injury and recommendations for mechanical ventilation of patients with ARDS," Semin. Respit. Critical Care Medicine, 2001, June, 22, 3, pages 269-280
- Price, J.L., "The Evolution of Breathing Machines," (see also reference #1 and #3 above)
- Szmuk, op cit, page 225
- Price, op cit
- "Resuscitation and Artificial Respiration," freewebs.com, Scientific Anti-Vivisectionism, http://www.freewebs.com/scientific_anti_vivisectionism4/resuscitation.htm, accessed March 1, 2012 (see also reference 1 above)
- Lee, op cit
- Price, op cit
- Price, op cit
- Szmuk, op cit, page 225
- Price, op cit
- Woollam, C.H.M., "The development of apparatus for intermittent positive pressure respiration," Anaesthesia, 1976, volume 31, pages 537-147
- Previtera, Joseph, "Negative Pressure Ventilation: Operating Procedure (Iron Lung)," Tufts Medical Center, Respirator Care Programs, http://22.214.171.124/respcare/npv.htm, and http://126.96.36.199/respcare/ironlung.htm, accessed February 27, 2012
- Szmuk, op cit, page 226-7
- Fourgeaud, V.J, "Medicine Among the Arabs," (Historical Sketches), Pacific medical and surgical journal, Vol. VII, ed. V.J. Fourgeaud and J.F. Morse, 1864, San Fransisco, Thompson & Company, pages 193-203 (referenced to page 198-9)
- "Biographical Dictionary of the society for the diffusion of useful knowledge," Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, volume III, 1843, A. Spottingwood, London, page 124-5
- Tissler, Paul Louis Alexandre, "Pneumotherapy: Including Aerotherapy and inhalation...," 1903, Philadelphia, Blakiston's sons and Company, page 284,5
- Hasan, Ashfaq, "Understanding Mechanical Ventilation: A practical Handbook," 2010, New York, Springer
- Ball, James B, "Intubation of the Larynx," 1891, London, H.K. Lewis
- Garrison, Fielding Hudson, "An introduction to the history of medicine," 1922, 3rd edition, Philadelphia and London, W.B. Saunders Company
- Banser, Robert C., Sairam Parthasarathy, editors, Nocturnal Noninvasive Ventilation, Theory, Evidence, and Clinical Practice," 2015, Springer, New York, chapter 2, "Negative Pressure Noninvasive Ventilation (NPNIV): History, Rational, and Application," by Norma M.T. Braun