1940-1970: The decline and return of tuberculosis

By the 1940s there were a variety of antibiotics that allowed physicians to control most cases of tuberculosis. For patients that seek medical attention and follow the prescription of their physician, tuberculosis can be controlled and even cured. By 1969 it seemed that the disease had been conquered, and attention was diverted from it.

It seems to be normal for human beings to forget that of which they do not see. When we don't have a war for a while, we tend to assume one will never occur again and we cut our military spending. When a war occurs, we usually aren't prepared. The same can be said of disease. When we go years without a plague, we assume the disease is cured. When the plague strikes, we aren't prepared. A perfect example of this is the Spanish Flu of 1918.  

There was a friend of mine who often said that we ought to have a war every ten years so we don't forget that freedom comes with a price. We should have a plague every so often so that we don't take these diseases for granted. Surely we don't want wars or plagues, but my friend had a valid point.

By the 1930s and 40s sulfa drugs and antibiotics were discovered as a means of treating infection. These and other medicines allowed physicians to effectively treat and even cure tuberculosis. This decade saw a rapid decline in the number of tuberculosis patients.  

According to Elaine Landau, in her 1995 book "Tuberculosis:"

As late as 1969, the federal government was still channeling annually more than $20 million in TB project grants to local clinics and hospitals throughout the nation. But the declining TB rate made people feel that the crisis was over. So when the government began giving blocks of aid to states and municipalities to be used at the areas' discretion, the funding generally was not expended for TB controll. 

As time passed,countless successful TB programs were dismantled. In New York City alone, more than one thousand beds formerly reserved for TB patients were eliminated from municipal hospitals. Although outpatient services were supposed to be established to ensure the disease's continued decline, these were never made available. Instead, funding was diverted to meet more immediate needs. As one physician who's treated numerous TB victims described the situation, "We knew how to cure it. We had it in our hands. But we dropped the ball. (1, page 3, 4)

Once the "ball was dropped" it was difficult to pick it up again. Organizations with the ability to provide methods of preventing the spread of such diseases, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), were not provided with enough funds to effectively perform this task. (1, page 34)

In 1989 a plan was made to provide the CDC with $30 to $34 million dollars to create a TB control plan. Yet the plan was never made "because each year that it was proposed, the White House eliminated its funding from the budget." A similar plan was proposed in 1993 to offer $484 million for TB prevention, but the budget was cut by the Clinton administration to $124 million before it was sent to Congress. So the return of a disease that once ravaged a nation was greatly ignored by Reagan, Bush and Clinton. (1, page 35)

What may have opened the eyes of the government was the AIDS epidemic that struck during the 1980s. Studies showed that with weakened immune systems, up to 50 percent of AIDS victims were developing tuberculosis, and were unable to fight it off. This is one reason tuberculosis spread through prisons and homeless shelters rather fast, particularly in cities like New York "where nearly one-fifth of prison inmates have TB, but none of the jails have separately ventilated cells for contagious cases." (1, page 35-37)

To make matters worse the TB bacteria has the ability to mutate to create drug resistant strains. This occurs when people who are given antibiotics, which are proven to cure TB if used properly, were not taking the antibiotics once they started feeling better. Effective treatment usually takes 6-9 months, but many would stop taking it within weeks.

Landau also said that "this is actually worse than not taking any medication at all, because over a period of time the illness no longer responds to any form of medication, and they have, in fact, dissipated the drug's effectiveness... Unfortunately, significant numbers of people have misused their medication this way. The tendency to do so appears to cut across racial, class, and economic lines." (1, page 39)

Studies show that up to 50 percent of TB patients do not take their medicine as prescribed, and that 14.1 percent of TB cases responded poorly to TB medicines. Studies also showed that TB resistant strains have a 50 percent mortality rate. (1, page 39-40)

References:

1. Landau, Elaine, "Tuberculosis," 1995, New York, Chicago, London, Toronto and Sydney, Franklin Watts 

1840-1903: Open air treatment for consumption

Figure 1 -1899, National Jewish Hospital, TB patients treated with sunlight (4)

Around the turn of the 20th century tuberculosis was a common ailment, and a leading cause of death.  Yet it also lead to a general feeling of gloom among the populace, especially considering little was known about it and there was no cure.  Yet if you had it there was hope, thanks to places like sanatoriums and hospitals like National Jewish Hospital for Consumptives in Denver Colorado.

In the 1840s Hermann Brehmer (1826-1889) was diagnosed with the condition and he told his doctor he might benefit from the open air of the Himalayas.  He also decided there might be benefits from isolating tuberculosis patients from the rest of the community, so he created hydrotherapy institution in Gorbesdorf, which is a village in Silesia, Germany. 

Bre

At first he had trouble convincing the medical community he was on the right track, but ultimately he became so successful that various sanatoriums opened in mountainous areas all over Europe and the United States.  One famous one in the United States was built in Denver, Colorado in 1899 by the Jewish Community. 

Many of the Jewish Community who were struck with tuberculosis were flocking to the Denver area because of it's fresh, dry, mountainous air.  Yet many of these victims were without enough money to be able to afford food or housing.

This was brought to the attention of Frances Wishbart Jacobs who worked hard to raise money to build shelter for these destitute victims of consumption.  She was able to find support from members of the Jewish Community and then to generate enough money to build an institution.  (1)

National Jewish Hospital 1892

In 1892 Jacobs died, and a year later the building was finished.  Yet the country was also mired in a recessions that year prompted by the silver crisis, and this resulted in a lack of funds to open the facility.  The building laid empty until Rabbi William S. Friedman took up a project to complete and open the institution.  (2)

The doors to the National Jewish Hospital for Consumptives opened in 1899 with the motto: "None may enter who can pay -- none can pay who enter." (1)  While it was originally built by the Jewish Community, anyone was allowed to enter who needed help.  (2)

One of the original therapies for tuberculosis patients in Denver was to receive heliotherapy, which was sunlight therapy (See figure 1).  It was believed that sunlight would help them "combat the disease."  (3)  This type of therapy, along with open air therapy altogether, was supported by Thomas Beddoes (1803-49), who performed many tests on respiratory patients, and Herrmann Brehmer (1826-89), who, as noted, opened the first sanitorium.  (3, page 37)

Figure 4 -- Open air therapy for TB patient at his home (3, page 38)

Studies were also done that showed TB patients recover faster in the winter than summer months.  In fact, "Dr. Otto Walther says he not infrequently had an inch of snow on his blankets.  At some localities tents are the only shelter, but whether the patients are housed in cottages or in tents, the free access of air must be absolute and uninterrupted. Drafts are not feared. At night the windows, which should constitute at least one side of the room or ward, are kept open; in some places the sashes are removed altogether; the sides of the tents are rolled up, except in the severest storms. In very cold weather the head and hands may be protected with woolen cap and gloves, and at all times the patients are well provided with blankets. In summer the beds or reclining chairs are moved into the open or into covered porches during the day; for the winter most places are provided with glass porches or sun parlors; where the patients spend their days in bed or reclining in steamer chair." (3, page 38)

(5, page 44)

The benefits of open air therapy as reported were: (3, page 39)

• Reduction of the fever
• Improvement of the appetite,
• Induction of sleep

As noted, "Cough and night-sweats disappear in a short time, and, as a logical consequence, the medicinal treatment is reduced to a minimum. Antipyretic drugs are never used and expectorants are rarely required. Suralimentation (the belief that consumption could be cured by forcing them to eat) is practised in many places, especially in the German resorts, where it is pushed to an almost incredible degree; even bed patients with considerable pyrexia are placed on a full diet of meat and vegetables. Trudeau and Flick * content themselves with giving their patients three full meals a day, allowing them to drink milk between meals if they have a desire for it; when, however, there is anorexia, the patient is given raw eggs beaten up with milk every two or three hours." (3, page 39)

While open air treatment was utilized "judiciously" and based on "individual cases," the therapy could also be recommended for home use as well. (See figure 4) Patients may also benefit from treatment in tents, walks or rides in the open air.  (3, page 39)

Another type of therapy was pulmonary gymnastics, or exercise.  While this was debated as an effective therapy, it was often recommended at the various sanatoriums.

In 1895 a German by the name of Wilhelm Konrad von Roentgen discovered the x-ray that allowed doctors to see the disease in its early as well as it's late stages.  This marked the first time that the disease could be diagnosed in its early stages instead of having to wait to see the late signs.  It also allowed doctors to see the tubercles in those who had survived the disease.  It showed both active and inactive tuberculosis.

References:

1. Gurock, Jeffrey S., ed., "American Jewish History," 1998, New York, vol. 3, part 3, pages 1095-6
2. "The History of National Jewish," NationalJewish.org, http://www.nationaljewish.org/about/whynjh/history/
3. Tissier, Pneumotherapy
4. Photo compliments of National Jewish Health, Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151140094301092&set=a.140185801091.110191.41885201091&type=1&theater, accessed on 10/20/12
5. Picture from the Journal of the Outdoor Life," National Tuberculosis Association, Volume XI, January, 1914, 10 cents an issue or $1.00 a year

1865: Mackenzie specializes in diseases of throat and chest

Morell Mackenzie (1837-1892)

Dr. Morell Mackenzie was one of the preeminent experts on diseases of the throat during the second half of the 19th century. He would either write or edit various books on diseases of the throat and chest and the best remedies to treat them.

He was born in Leytonstone, Essex, in 1837, and was educated at London Hospital Medical College and in Paris and Vienna.  (4)

He became one of the first experts on the laryngoscope that was invented by Manuel Garcia of Paris.  By using this device he was able to see with the aide of this scope the effects of various diseases on the larynx, pharynx, bronchi, and bronchioles.

In 1862 he opened one of the first hospitals dedicated specifically to diseases of the throat and chest called "Free Dispensary for Diseases of the Throat and Loss of Voice at 5 King Street (later renamed Kingly Street).  (1)

He went on to become assistant physician at the London Hospital, and then full physician.  He was also appointed lecturer on diseases of the throat, an appointment he held for the rest of his life. (4)

The building on Golden Square
as it appeared in 2008,
owned by Clear Media Group

The Dispensary was an instant success, and by 1865 had moved to larger premises (32 Golden Square), to a building that had previously housed the London Homeopathic Hospital from 1851-1856.  The name of the Dispensary was then changed to "The Hospital for Diseases of the Throat."  (1)

This was the first hospital that specialized in diseases of the throat in the United Kingdom, and it was in this year, in 1865, that the hospital took in its first inpatients. (1)

As the number of patients being admitted to the hospital with consumption was steadily increasing, in 1877 the name of the hospital was once again changed to Hospital for Diseases of the Throat and Chest." (1)

Another picture of
the former hospital.

The hospital initially provided free treatment, although eventually a system was established allowing patients to contribute payments based on the their incomes.  (1)

In 1865, Dr. Mackenzie published what he learned about diseases of the throat and chest, and their treatments, in his book "The Use of the Laryngoscope in Diseases of the Throat."  It was in this book that he discussed how directed the invention of the Eclectic Inhaler for the direct application of moist, medicated steam to the throat.

In January of 1887, Prince Frederick III of the German Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia, developed hoarseness that progressively worsened.  Initially German physicians thought this was due to the prince speaking too much, but then it was decided he had a case of catarrh, or the common cold.  (3, page 1)

However,  none of the usual catarrhal symptoms made their appearance, and the usual inhalations to treat catarrh were ineffective.  Because of this, Surgeon General Dr. Wegner and Adolf Bardeleben performed a laryngoscopy on March 6, 1887, where they were able to see a growth between the vocal cords.    (3, page 1)

At first it was thought to be a harmless growth, such as a polyp.  Various treatments were made to remedy the situation, but none of them worked.  At one point the growth had been removed, and then grew back larger than it was before the operation.  It was at this time, in May, 1887, that his physicians decided he had cancer of the throat.  (3, pages 4-6)

In order that he would receive the best treatment, his leading physician requested he be seen by Dr. Mackenzie, who was the leading expert on diseases of the throat at the time.  (1)(2)(3, page 1, 8)

Basing his decision on a biopsy report by German pathologist Rudolf Virchow that showed throat lesions in the prince's throat were not cancerous, and his own examination of the patient's throat, Dr. Mackenzie decided the prince did not have throat cancer after all. This decision was made despite evidence the prince still had throat hoarseness. (1)(2) (3, page 34)

Dr. Mackenzie recommended to the prince's physicians that, instead of rushing the prince to surgery, that it be delayed until further testing was performed. All of the prince's physicians, respecting Dr. Mackenzie's expert consultation, decided to heed his recommendation and delay further treatment.   (3, page 10)

At first this seemed like a good idea, as the treatment offered by Dr. Mackenzie seemed to benefit the prince, who continued to hold the doctor in high regard. In September 1887,  Dr. Morell Mackenzie was held in such high regard at this time that he was knighted by Queen Victoria* for his service to medicine and to prince Frederick.  (4)(2)

A few months later, in November of 1888, as the prince's condition continued to deteriorate, it became quite clear that Dr. Mackenzie was wrong, that the prince actually did have throat cancer. (2)

That same month, after a thorough assessment of the patient, his physicians, which included Dr. Mackenzie, offered the prince the risky option of having surgery to remove the cancerous tumor, and he declined.  He opted, instead, to have a tracheotomy inserted when it might become necessary. (3, page 44)

Emperor Frederick III (1831-1888)
Reign (March 9-June 15, 1888)

In March, 1888, Frederick III became emperor of the German Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia.

By this time it was determined the only operative help was to perform a palliative tracheotomy. (1)(2)(3, page 43-44)

Emperor Frederick III died on June 15, after only 99 days as emperor. He was 56 years old.

A controversy ensued where Dr. Morel Mackenzie was blamed for the emperor's death. He was adamantly criticized by German physicians, and even accused of malpractice.

Mackenzie responded by publishing his side of the story in his 1888 book  "The Fatal Illness of Frederick the Noble."

After a review of the case, it was determined that Dr. Mackenzie should have treated the growth as if it were cancerous "if only from fear that it might become malignant," said Dr. Bardeleben.  (3, page 15)

Dr. Bardeleben explained that if the tumor returned after its removal, a tracheotomy should have been performed to allow "radical extirpation of the disease." (3, page 15)

As a result of this review, and as a consequence of his 1888 publication, Dr. Mackenzie was censured by the Royal College of Surgeons. (1) (2)

Despite the controversy, the remainder of his life went on without consequence.

After suffering from bronchitis for a few days, Dr. Mackenzie developed pneumonia and died rather unexpectedly on February 3, 1892, at the age of 54. The hospital he helped to create, however, would continue to serve patients with diseases of the ear, nose, throat, and lungs until 1985, when the premises of Golden Square were closed.  (1) (4)

*Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom was Frederick's mother-in-law. He was married to Princess Victoria, the oldest daughter of the Queen.

References:

1. Lost Hospitals of London: "Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital," http://ezitis.myzen.co.uk/rntnehgolden.html, accessed 9/5/14
2. "Sir Morel Mackenzie," britannica.com, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/354858/Sir-Morell-Mackenzie, accessed 9/5/14
3. Bardeleben, Adolf, "The illness of the emperor Frederick the third," 1888, Berlin, G. Schenck, Royal Publisher
4. Obituary: Sir Morell Mackenzie, New York Times, February 4, 1892, http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9505EFDD1E39E033A25757C0A9649C94639ED7CF, accessed 9/5/14

RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter

1847 definition: Asthma the opposite of consumption

As noted in the writings of Dr. Francis Ramadge, a common belief around the middle of the 19th century was that asthma was the opposite of consumption. This theme was further acknowledged through the writings of Dr. Samuel Fitch in his book "Six lectures on the uses of the lungs.

He said: 

"It is a disease caused by consumption or consumptive tendency in the lungs, and always arrests the progress of consumption.  It is a vastly lesser disease given in place of a greater, and instead of being a curse, is a greater blessing.  In consumption, the lungs are too small; in asthma they are too larger.  A disease like asthma may be produced by ossification of blood vessels of the heart; but in nearly all cases, it is produced by consumptive irritation of the lungs.  It often takes place suddenly, in earliest childhood, continues until between 12 and 20, then goes off and is never seen again; but the person falls victim to consumption.  Or asthma my reappear and secure the patient from consumption.  If properly treated it is a passport to old age; but when badly treated it may terminate in dropsy of the chest." (1, pages 69-71)

Next to this description is a picture of an asthmatic rib cage and a consumptive rib cage. The asthmatic rib cage is large and expanded as thought the patient had his chest puffed out.  The consumptive rib cage is small, narrow and weak.

Thus, Fitch believed since asthma produces a larger rib cage it protects against consumption.  It's strong and mighty while consumption is weak and frail.  While both are diseases that cause discomfort, asthma is minor compared to consumption.  Asthma is temporary and goes away, and consumption is long lasting.

Yet under it all he believes consumption causes asthma in some cases, and this is good because asthma protects against the wasting effects of the underlying consumption. (1)

He wrote:

"Asthma all but always cures consumption, or what is made consumption by very bad treatment.  The asthma leaves the person, and he rapidly is overcome by the consumption that had always been on him whilst he had the asthma, and resumes it's rapid and fatal course, on asthma leaving him.  If asthma is cured without perfectly expanding the lungs, and keeping them so, the person is extremely liable to consumption."

Asthma is a blessing and masks the underlying diseases, and even protects the person from wasting or consumption. He describes a patients who had asthma, didn't take care of it not knowing he had underlying consumption, and died of consumption. (1)

"As in heart disease, woe to the person who is cured of asthma.  Without a free, and perfect, and continued expansion of the chest; as he will, in nearly all cases, sooner or later fall into consumption."

The patient must be brought up well, he proposes.  He must be exposed to outdoor occupations and he must exercise.  This is how to treat asthma and prevent it from going away so consumption doesn't show it's ugly head again, destroy him, and ultimately kill him.

So basically he's saying take care of your asthma if you have it because it's a blessing protecting you from the course of your underlying consumption.

There were other physicians who had similar beliefs about asthma and consumption.  Orville Harry Brown gives us the following quote from two physicians named Hall and Hall (further detail eludes me):  (2, page 33)

"Asthma is a spasmodic contraction of the membranous portion of the windpipe. In consumption the patient dies because there are not lungs enough to receive sufficient air for the wants of the system; that is, they cannot get enough air in; while in asthma they cannot get enough air out; hence asthma and consumption are antagonistic, the former is preventive of the latter and a consumptive is cured on the supervention of asthma."

The idea of asthma as an underlying disease, and of asthma as a blessing, is ironic to say the least.  This was not the first time in history that asthma was considered a blessing, as the ancient Greeks believed asthma was a blessing from the gods.

References:

1. Fitch, Samuel Sheldon, "Six lectures on the uses of the lungs," 1847, London, H. Carlisle
2. Brown, Orville Harry, "Asthma, presenting an exposition of nonpassive expiration theory," 1917, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company

RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter

1887: The infamous Dr. Gee

Samuel Gee (1839-1911)

When I was a student at Ferris State University in 1990 I had a philosophy teacher who made sure we were not one second late for class.  I was reminded of him as I learned about the punctual Dr. Samuel Jones Gee.

The Historic Hospital Admission Records Project (HHARP) said:

"His reputation as a teacher was second to none, and his punctuality the stuff of legend. He was leaving his house in a cab one day, when a patient detained him. As the conversation continued, the door of the vehicle swung open, hit a tree, and fell off its hinges. He insisted on carrying on to Bart’s minus the cab door, so that he would not be late." (1)

He was born in 1839 and developed a love for history, and because of this he became proficient in many languages, including Ancient Greek.  His ability to read and write in Greek would eventually benefit children around the world, as it allowed him to compare ancient accounts of diseases with what he observed during his own personal assessments and examinations on autopsy.

He attended college at University College School in London and studied medicine at the University College Hospital.  He impressed as a student enough to be hired as house surgeon at University College Hospital where he worked until 1865 when he earned his medical degree.

He was then hired at the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Osmond Street where he would eventually serve as pediatrician and pathologist.  He was passionate about learning about diseases and how to treat them, and he loved performing autopsies.

While his main job was working at the children's hospital, he also worked at St. Bartholemew's Hospital and managed to maintain a private practice.  A private practice back then involved the doctor traveling to the patient's home instead of the other way around as it is today.  So, while lucrative, it was a lot of work, and often quite risky.

He wrote 2 books and published 46 papers in St. Bartholemew's Hospital Report, with almost all of his writings on pediatric diseases -- which included asthma, bronchitis and consumption (tuberculosis).   HHARP mentions that one of the biggest complaints against him was he didn't write enough. (1)

He was best known for is a lecture he gave in 1887 in which he gave the first modern day description of coeliac disease, a condition that affected many of the children he treated.  He described the condition this way:

“There is a kind of chronic indigestion which is met with in persons of all ages, yet is especially apt to affect children between one and five years old. Signs of the disease are yielded by the fæces; being loose, not formed, but not watery; more bulky than the food taken would seem to account for; pale in colour, as if devoid of bile; yeasty, frothy, an appearance probably due to fermentation; stinking, stench often very great, the food having undergone putrefaction rather than concoction".

He learned a lot about this disease by reading ancient accounts written by Aretaeus of Cappaocia who was a master clinician about 100 A.D.  Areteaus was known for providing some of the first descriptions for many diseases, such as pleurisy, diphtheria, tetanus, pneumonia, diabetes epilepsy and asthma.

He was also the first to describe the symptoms of coeliac disease, although he referred to it as coeliac diathesis.  Gee chose to respect Areteaus and referred to the condition as the coeliac affection.  Today we refer to the condition as coeliac disease. (2)

The condition causes it's victims to become pale, weak and appear to be wasting away, symptoms similar to tuberculosis.  Aerateaus believed it only occurred in adults, yet Gee recognized it could affect anyone, although it was most common among children aged 1-5, which was one of the main reasons Gee became so enthralled by the disease.

Gee was the first to differentiate between coeliac disease and tuberculosis, and he brought coeliac disease to the mainstream in the medical world.  He was also the first to suggest the cause and cure might be in the diet. 

Coeliac disease is similar to asthma in that neither disease causes any changes in their respective organs.  Of Coeliac disease Gee wrote, "Naked-eye examination of dead bodies throws no light upon the nature of the coeliac affection: nothing unnatural can be seen in the stomach, intestines, or other digestive organs."

Aerateus had a theory as to what caused asthma, and he likewise had a theory for coeliac disease.  He believed a "natural or indwelling" heat was needed for proper digestion, or "pepsis" as he referred to it.  Pepsis was the natural breaking down of food which occurred in the heat.  (2)

Aeratus explained that Coeliac affection was caused by a "chilling of the natural heat needed for 'pepsis.'"

Gee didn't agree with this, although he didn't pretend to know a cause or remedy.  A cause and treatment of the disease alluded the medical world until the 1950s when the condition was linked to the consumption of gluten in the diet.

Coeliac disease is now considered an autoimmune disorders, and some say astma is too.

Dr. Gee passed away in 1911, yet many of his publications are still available thanks to Google Books. His writings have come very useful in writing this history of difficult breathing.

References:

1. "Dr. Samuel Jones Gee", Historic Hospital Admission Records Project,  http://hharp.org/library/gosh/doctors/samuel-jones-gee.html, accessed 8/21/14
2.  Dowd, Brian, John Walker Smith, "Samuel Gee, Areteaus, and the Coeliac Affection," 1974, British Medical Journal, April 6, page 45
3.  Gee, Samuel, "Bronchitis, Pulmonary Emphysema, and Asthma,", Lancet, March 25, 1899, page 817
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter