Friday, November 13, 2015

1658: Swammerdam discovers RBCs

Jan Swammerdam (1637-1680)
His father, Jan Jacobzoon Swammerdam (1606-1678) worked as a Dutch pharmacist and had an apothecary shop and a fine collection of naturalia including both animals and insects. This created the perfect environment for his son, Jan Swammerdam, to develop an interest in insects and animals, enough to dissect them and inspect them, and their internals, with the compound microscope.

After he graduated, he apparently had a quarrel with his father, as he wanted to practice medicine.  His father, on the other hand, believed he was too skilled as a scientist, and in the end he won out.  The young Swammerdam "never killed or cure a patient. (21, page 71)

He became a skillful anatomist, zoologist and entomologist, and he would end up describing over 3,000 species of insects, many of which can be read about in the book "Natural History of Insects." (18, page 77) (20)(21, page 71)

He would end up giving up his interest in anatomy for religious purposes after being convinced of its sinfulness after reading the works of Antoinette Bourgnon (1616-1680).  Bourgnon traveled through France, Belgium and Holland trying to sell her brand of Christianity, and many were convinced by her words, including Swammerdam. (17, page 71)(18)(21, page 71)

The young Swammerdam was so into his new religion that he refused to participate in science, even to the point that he did nothing, not even publish, the material he had been working on. (21, page 710)

He ended up selling his collection for a low price before he died of malaria in 1680.  After he did so, the works of Bourgnon were viewed as being so radical that they were forbidden by both the Protestant and Catholic Church by 1699.  (17, page 71)(18)(21, page 71)

However, before he gave up the science, he studied insects and animals in implicit detail, describing them and their anatomy. He was the first to describe the anatomy and life cycle of bees and other insects. (11, page 251) (12, page 366) (18, page 77)

In 1658 he discovered red blood cells in the blood of frogs. In 1664 He discovered valves in the lymphatics. He also studied the heart, lungs, and muscles. (11, page 251)

He postulated that an element (later found to be oxygen) could be carried by blood to the various muscles of the body.  (11, page 251)(12, page 366)

In 1667 he discovered that fetal lungs of mammals sink before a breath has been taken, and float after respiration has taken place.  (11, page 251)(12, page 366)

He also demonstrated that a frog leg could be made to contract, and this proved useful by later investigators, or at least investigators who were privy to his work once it was published posthumously as Bybel der Natuur (Book of Nature) by Herman Boerhaave in 1737. (11, page 251)(12, page 366)

The book contained, said Garrison, "some 53 plates with accurate life histories, giving the finer anatomy of bees, the mayflies, the snail, the clam, the squid and the frog. The drawings in this collection surpass all other contemporary work in exquisite delicacy and accuracy of detail." (11, page 251)(12, page 366)

References:
  1. Tissier
  2. Lagerkvist, Ulf, "The Enigma of Ferment," 2005, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing
  3. Potter, Elizabeth, "Gender and Boyle's Law of Gases," 2001, Indiana University Press
  4. Newman, William R, et al, "Alchemy Tried in the Fire," 2002, University of Chicago
  5. Lehrs, Ernst, "Man or Matter," 1958, Great Britain, Whistable Litho Ltd.
  6. Jindel, S.K., "Oxygen Therapy," 2008, pages 5-8
  7. Hill, Leonard, Benjamin Moore, Arthur Phillip Beddard, John James Rickard, etc., editors, "Recent Advances in Physiology and bio-chemistry," 1908, London, Edward Arnold
  8. Hamilton, William, "A History of Medicine, Surgery and Anatomy," 1831, Vol. I, London, New Burlington
  9. Osler, William Henry, "The evolution of Modern Medicine: A series of lectures delivered at Yale University on the Sillman Foundation in April, 1913," 1921, New Haven, Yale University Press
  10. Osler, ibid, pages 170, reference referring to William Harvey: Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, Francofurti, 1628, G. Moreton's facsimile reprint and translation, Canterbury, 1894, p. 48. 20 Ibid., p. 49.
  11. Garrison, Fielding Hudson, "Introduction to the history of medicine," 1921, London, 
  12. Baker, Christopher, editor, "The Great Cultural Eras of the Western World: Absolutism and the Scientific Revolution 1600-1720: A biographical dictionary," 2002, CT, Greenwood Publishing; Herman Boerhavve published Biblia Naturae (Bible of Nature) in 1737, which was a two volume compilation of the works of Jan Swammerdam. Can you read Latin?
  13. Garrison, op cit, 266; (Samuel) Pepy's Diary, Mynors Bright's ed., London, 1900, v, 191
  14. Bradford, Thomas Lindsley, writer, Robert Ray Roth, editor, “Quiz questions on the history of medicine from the lectures of Thomas Lindley Bradford M.D.,” 1898, Philadelphia, Hohn Joseph McVey
  15. Brock, Arthur John, "Galen on the natural faculties," 1916, London, New York, William Heinemann, G.P. Putnam's Sons
  16. "History of Chemistry," historyworld.net, http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?ParagraphID=kpt, accessed 7/6/14
  17. Affray, Charles, Denis Noble, "Origins of Systems Biology in William Harvey's masterpiece on the Movement of the Heart and the Blood in Animals," April 17, 2009, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(2), pages 1658-1669, found online at ncbi.nlm.hih.gov, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680639/, accessed 7/8/14
  18. Thomsen, Elsebeth, "Niels Stensen--Steno, in the world of collections and museums," from the book "The Revolution in Geology from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment," edited by Gary D. Rosenberg, 2009, U.S.A., The Geological Society of America
  19. "Antoinette Bourignon (1616-1680)," distinguishedwomen.com, http://www.distinguishedwomen.com/biographies/bourigno.html, accessed 7/10/14
  20. Swammerdam, Jan, "Natural History of Insects," 1892, Edinburgh, Printed By R. Morrison Junior
  21. Robinson, William J, "The Medical Critic and Guide," volume 19, January-December, 1916, New York, "Jan Swammerdam (1637-1680), pages 71-72
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

1664: Sylvius improves medical image


Sylvius started a medical clinic at Leyden in 1658.
A future successor of his was Herman Boerhaave,
who re-established respect for the profession by
having his students learn at the bedside, and focusing
on studying the patient before regarding theories.
Methods used at the clinic were so popular that
they quickly spread to other clinics in Britain, and
then throughout the whole of Europe. 
Francois de la Boe, also known as Sylvius, was among the first physicians who helped transform alchemy into chemistry, and improve the image of the medical profession.  

He was born in Hanau in the Netherlands in 1614, was educated at Paris, Sedan, Leyden and Basle, and earned his medical degree from Basle at the age of 23. He opened a practice at Hanua, and later moved it to Leyden and then Amsterdam.  He quickly became a very successful physician.  (1, page 115)

In 1660 he was hired as professor at Leyden, and in 1664 he opened the first medical clinic at Leyden. He also started what is believed to be the first university chemical laboratory.  (1, page 115)(2, page 68)

Bradford said: 
Here he had many pupils on account of the clinical method of instruction and his convenient system with its therapeutics. 
He was, therefore, among the first to take the student to the bedside of the patient in order to get the best medical education. This was an idea adapted and perfected by a future student and professor at Leyden by the name of Herman Boerhaave. This model of educating medical students would be later adapted by medical schools throughout Britain, all of Europe, and eventually the United States. (2, page 68)(3)

Bradford said Sylvius was a firm user of chemistry, and in this way transitioned the profession from alchemy to chemistry. His main ideas about medicine mainly follow the Hippocratic model, that diseases are caused by an imbalance of the humours. Although, like most physicians, he ads his own elements to the theory. Of this, Bradford said: (1, page 116)
There were three cardinal fluids—the saliva, the pancreatic fluid and the bile. The majority of diseases are caused by excess of acidity in the system or alkalinity. Health consisted in the undisturbed performance in the body of the process of fermentation; the saliva was thought to give rise to hectic fevers because there was some fever after eating. (1, page 116)
Bradford said the diagnostics of Sylvius can be summed up by the following passage by Sylvius:
As often as the whole blood appears black, it indicates that the acidity predominates; if the blood is redder, it shows that the bile in it is overabundant. In the first case the acid in the body and in the blood must be diminished; in the second, the bile must be lessened and its power broken. If the blood which is normally free from odor and of a sweetish taste, tastes salty, the alkali in the body is too pure, and when brought into contact with the acid spiritus engenders a humor of a saline taste which is prejudicial to the body. Fever is diagnosed by the pulse and not by the heat of the body. (1, page 116) 
In blending chemistry and medicine, britannica.com says that he "held that all phenomena of life and disease are based on chemical action."  Britannica also says that he blended William Harvey's proof that blood circulated through the body with the Hippocratic and Galen humoral theory. (3)

Regarding the view of Sylvius on the respiratory system, late 18th and early 19th century asthma expert Robert Bree said the following about Sylvius:
According to Sylvius, the parenchyma of the lungs is sometimes dense and corrugated, occasioning dyspnoea. He attributes this state to the restringent quality of the blood, but it may be assigned perhaps, with more reason, to preceding inflammation. (4, page 32)
Bradford said "his therapeutics were simple. We must get rid of the acids or the alkalies. When the acid is in excess give an alkali, when the alkali is in excess give an acid.  (1, page 116)

Bradford continued "(the) general object of therapeutics was to keep up the strength of the patient, remove diseases, mitigate symptoms, and remove their causes."  He listed the following as the remedies of Sylvius:
  • Heating methods
  • Absorbants
  • Emetics
  • Etc. 
Unlike most physicians of his era, he did not recommend bleeding.

Bradford said his ideas regarding medicine earned him many followers, although of his remedies, on the other hand, "it has been said that his therapeutics cost as many lives as the thirty years' war." (1, page 116)

Overall, like various other physicians from the 18th century (such as Boerhaave), and even while he was an ardent supporter of older theories, his contributions helped transform medicine away from "mythical speculation to a rational application of universal laws of physics and chemistry." (3)

References:
  1. Bradford, Thomas Lindsley, writer, Robert Ray Roth, editor, “Quiz questions on the history of medicine from the lectures of Thomas Lindley Bradford M.D.,” 1898, Philadelphia, Hohn Joseph McVey
  2. Foucault, Michael, "The Birth of the Clinic," 2003, Great Britain, Routledge Classics 
  3. Franciscus Sylvius, britannica.com, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/577670/Franciscus-Sylvius, accessed 11/12/13
  4. Bree, Robert, "A practical Inquiry into Disordered Respiration," 1810, London,  
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

Monday, November 9, 2015

1553: Servetus discovers circulation, sort of

Michael Servetus (1509?-1553)
Michael Servetus, a Spanish physician, discovered that blood circulates through the body.  He accurately diagrammed the flow of blood through the body, and explained that the lungs cause the arterial blood to be a brighter red in color, and not the heart, as Galen taught. (1, page 474)

He was also the first to speculate that blood does not cross through a septum (or invisible pores) from the right ventricle to the left ventricle as Galen had suggested, but takes another route. He said the blood entered the left ventricle during diastole, and this is where the "vital spirit" is formed, and from there it travels to the arteries. (2, page 63-64)

In his 1806 book, Richard Wright said that past historians and physicians had described Servetus as having wrote about circulation in a book he had published in 1553.  Wright said: (4, page 312
In a book of his entitled, Christianismi Restitutio (The Restoration of Christianity), printed in the year 1553, he clearly asserts, that the blood passes through the lungs, from the left to the right ventricle of th heart, and not through the partition which divides the two ventricles, as was at that time commonly believed.  How he introduces it, or in which of the six discourses into which he divides his book, it is to be found I know not; having never seen the book myself. (4, page 313)
However, despite such an observation, Servetus did not sway too far from Galen in his understanding of the human body.  Wright quotes Servetus historian Dr. Wotton, who wrote:
Servetus saith, that there are three sorts of spirits in the human body, viz. natural, vital, and animal, which are not in reality three, but two distinct spirits only: the arteries communicating by anastomosis, the vital spirit to the veins, in which it is called natural.  The first spirit then is the blood, whose seat is in the liver, and in the veins of the body; the second is the vital spirit, whose seat is the brain and nerves. (4, page 314)
That we may therefore conceive how the blood comes to be the very life; we must first know, that the substantial generation of the vital spirit itself is made and nourished by the inspired air, and te most subtil blood.  The vital spirit hath its origin from the left ventricle of the heart, but its perfection chiefly from the lungs:  it is a fine spirit, produced by the power of a gentle heat, of a bright color, of an igneous quality; and is, as it were, a lucid vapor from te purest blood, having the substance of water, air, and fire.  It is generated by the air which we we inspire, mixt in the lungs with th elaborated subtil blood, which the right ventricle communicates to the left.
Now this communication is not made through the septum of th heart, as 'tis commonly believed; but the subtil blood is driven by a wonderful contrivance, from the right ventricle of the heart, through a long duct, into the lungs, by which it is prepared, and made bright; then it paseth from the vena arteriosa into the arteria venosa; there it mixeth with inspired air, and is purged from its fuligo by expiration.  Lastly, the whole mixture is brought into the left ventricle of the heart by diastole, and is become fit matter to produce the vital spirit...
A little after he adds, that vital spirit therefore is transfused from the left ventricle of the heart into the arteries of t whole body, in such a manner that the most subtil portion of it flies upward, where it is further refined, especially in the plexus retiformis, under the basis of the cerebrum, where the vital spirit begins to be changed into the animal one, drawing nearer to the true nature of a rational soul.
This is that famous passage (adds the author of the history) which is so much taken notice of, on account of the circulation of the blood.  There are indeed several things here that are remarkable, viz. that the blood, in a great stream, passes through a very large and wide duct, from the right ventricle of the heart, into the lungs; that there the blood is purified; and from thence it is driven, by the pulmonary vein, into the left ventricle of the heart; that there is an immediate communication between the arteries and the veins, by anastimosis; that the most pure part of the blood, refined in the lungs, enters the arteries, and from the arteries into the veins, &c.  This shows that Servetus was a great observer of nature, and no doubt would have improved those notions and carried them much further, had he not been prevented by an untimely death' 
This last sentence is important because, for being so brave to announce his suggestions that were opposed to the mighty Galen, he was accused of by the Calvinists of heresy and burned at the stake in 1553. Copies of his book were used as kindling.  His offense was so bad that he was burned "slowly to increase his agony," said Joseph K. Perloff in his 2009 book on the heart and circulation.  (3, page xxiii)

So, the fact that he did not have ample time to prove his theory of circulation, and the fact that so few of his books survived, prevented "its being known to the learned world until so long after," said Wright. (4, page 417-418)(5 page 225)

Regarding the way in which the career and life of Servetus was cut short by the Catholic Church, Wright said:
As to Dr. Wotton's saying 'Well had it been for the church of Christ, if he had confined himself to his own profession;' wherein does this appear? What did Servetus do to injure any church, or disturb tha tpeace of any man living?  Could not he point out what he thought th eerrors of his fellow christians, and endeavor to enlighten mankind, without injuring them?  It is true too many men are offended when their mistakes are pointed out; but ought this to be the case?  He thought for himself, and he made his opinion public; but what harm could arise to the church from his doing this? (4 page 318)
Such questions have been asked over and over, and the only answer to them is: "That's just the way it was."  The aristocracy, the Church, wanted to keep the masses ignorant.

Wright added:
With the Doctor's leave, the world has just cause to bless the memory of Servetus, not only for this important discovery; but also for the noble stand he made for christian liberty and the rights of conscience, against bigots and persecutors; for his steady exertions to discover and promote truth; and for the sacrifice he made of his reputation and his life, in attempting to extirpate deep-rooted errors and prejudices. (4, page 319) 
This is a perfect example of how history is not always fair to the inventors and discoverers of new wisdom.  Sometimes, the person who should get credit is ignored by history, and such was the case with Servetus.

However unfair it was the way Servetus met his end, his work started the ball rolling, so to speak, for circulation to be discovered, and proved,  over the next 100 years following his ill-timed death.

  1. Hill, Leonard, Benjamin Moore, Arthur Phillip Beddard, John James Rickard, etc., editors, "Recent Advances in Physiology and bio-chemistry," 1908, London, Edward Arnold
  2. Hamilton, William, "A History of Medicine, Surgery and Anatomy," 1831, Vol. I, London, New Burlington
  3. Brock, Arthur John, "Galen on the natural faculties," 1916, London, New York, William Heinemann, G.P. Putnam's Sons
  4. Wright, Richard, "An Apology for Dr. Michael Servetus: Including an Account of his Life, Persecution, Writings and Opinions: Being designed to eradicate Bigotry and Unchartableness: And to Promote Liberality of Sentiment Among Christians," 1806, London, Printed and Sold by F.B. Wright
  5. Perloff, Joseph K, "Physical Examination of the Heart and Circulation," 4th edition, 2009, People's Medical Publishing House-USA, Ltd
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

Friday, November 6, 2015

1543: Vesalius sparks end to dark ages of medicine

Figure 1 --Galen: even as we traveled in time 
to the beginning of the 16th century, 
we still find his medical ideas
being worshiped as the Bible. 
So our friend Claudius Galen wrote his book of anatomy and medicine in the 2nd century, just prior to the end of the Roman era of western civilization.  For greater than a thousand years physicians amid this civilization, instead of thinking on their own and advancing medicine, worshiped Galen as a god of medicine. His writings contained all the knowledge required of medical students.

Surely over the years there were errors observed in Galen's words, although these errors were always overlooked, explained away as "probably nothing."   Medical curiosity was frowned upon, and all was forgotten as western civilization dipped into a dark ages. 

People were content to remain ignorant until a man by the name of Andreas Vesalius wrote a book that stunned the scientific and medical community back into existence.  
Figure 2 -- Jacobus Sylvius (1614-1672) 
regarded the words of Galen 
as superior to even his own eyes.  




Vesalius was born in 1514, "into a world of physicians, pharmacists and royal patronage," explains Lois N. Magner.  "His father was imperial pharmacist to Charles V and often accompanied the Emperor on his travels.  As a youth, Vesalius began to teach himself anatomy by dissecting mice and other small animals."(4, page 158)

Galen's mighty reign as god of medicine ended almost as soon as Vesalius became a student at the University in Paris.  This is where we find him entering through the large doors, entering a large observatory with a podium in the front and a dissecting table with a fresh corps lying on top of it. 

Vesalius seems oblivious of the stench of rotting flesh as he pushes his way through the crowd of medical students and takes a position close to the table and waits for the professor and his assistant to enter.

After waiting a long fifteen minutes in the crowded, smoldering hot and putrid smelling room, a young assistant with blades in hand takes his position at the head of the autopsy table.  A second assistant is right behind him.  Behind them, behind a small podium on a stage, we find professor Jacobus Sylvius.

In 1909, Kerfoot D. Shute said that "Jacobus 
Sylvius (1478-1555) was born in Amiens, France, and
began teaching anatomy at Paris in 1531  He was an
uncompromising Galenist.  He preached Galen in
everything, and trusted Galen more than he did his own
eyes. To him instruction in anatomy was reading a
chapter of Galen and though he, on rare occasions,
made use of imperfect dissections of the human body
these dissections were simply for the purpose of
illustrating and making the teachings of Galen
and not for the purpose of disproving Galen."  (7, page 200)

Today he reads Galen's words once more, and as he does so his assistant displays what Galen is explaining. His voice is strong and powerful, radiating full and strong so even at the rear of the auditorium we can hear his every word.  His assistant usually dissects an animal, we know this from our history lessons, but today his students are privy to an actual human dissection. This is something Sylvius had not done for his students since this time last year.  


As Sylvius reads, loud and clear, the first assistant does the cutting, and the second points to each part of the body being described by Galen.  It's actually a neat system, and they have it down pat, as though they have done this hundreds of times before. (3, page )

After the dissection is done all the men are clear of the room except Vesaleas and Sylvius

Andreas says, "What you read and what your assistant pointed to did not agree."

Sylvius shouts, "There are no errors in the writings of Galen."

Andreas says, "Galen taught that the liver was five-lobed, that the breastbone had seven segments, that a network of blood vessels could be found under the brain. You believe every word of it, although those features couldn't be found in the body right under your eyes.  You see exactly what Galen tells you to see!

Sylvius shouts, "Get out!" He points to the door.

"If the corpse and book don't agree, then the error is in the book!"

"If the error and book don't agree, then the error is in the corpse!"

 "God forbid you doubt Galen."

"Get out!" Sylvius points aggressively this time.

"Michelangelo and van Calcar know more about the human anatomy than you, professor!"

"GET OUT!

"Those artists need accurate description of the body!  They study it up and down so they can accurately draw the body.  You guys merely studied Galen!

"YOU ARE A MAD MAN!

"Hmph!" is the noise that escapes Vesaleus, as he rushes out through the large doors, which bang shut in his absence.  We follow his path, and catch up to him as he trudges down the middle of a dirt road, dust spewing as a horse and buggy buz past.  He coughs.

Vesalius stops in front of a fountain and says, perhaps talking to us:
I am not content to just believe everything Galen writes.  The best teacher of the human body is not Galen but the human body. I stole a skeleton and studied it, yes I did.  I learned the human breastbone did not have eight segments as Galen described, it had only three parts.  How could a teacher as magnificent as Galen have gotten it wrong?" 
Figure 3 -- Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564)
doubted  the words of Galen
and risked his own life
to prove him wrong.
There is a long pause as Vesaleas appears to be gazing at his shadow waddles in the twinkling water. 
Then by chance one day I dissected an Ape.  It occurred to me:  Galen never even dissected a human body, otherwise he would have known the human sternum had only three parts.  For thousands of years doctors treated diseases based on the anatomy of apes not of humans."  
Vesalius turns to look our way, as tough he knows we are real, although we know he's actually looking at Sevalius as he exits the observatory. Sevalius does not stop, perhaps pretending he does not hear the young Vesalius as he says:
"I have a mission.  I hope you read of my discovery for history's sake!"
Vesaleas smiles.

Back in the time machine we sit and think about the day's events.  To Galen's defense we must remember  in both ancient Greece and Rome it was considered sacrosanct and illegal to dissect a human body.  In fact, it was illegal to even touch a corpse except for preparing it for burial.

Shute said:  "Galen was a brilliant man, and did an immense amount of good and useful work; but I believe his great egoism and his now very evident lack of candor in not stating frankly that his anatomy was mostly monkey anatomy and not human anatomy, struck a deadly blow at the development of science of human anatomy, the baneful effects of which lasted for over a thousand years." (7, page 198)
Even in the 16th century dissection of a human corpse was illegal without permission. While Sylvius probably obtained a legal corpse, most dissections were performed on bodies stolen from cemeteries.

By his coming out in the open with his discovery, Vesaleas, as observed, came head to head with his colleagues in the medical community.  His fellow physicians ridiculed him to the point he had no choice but to leave Paris without a degree. (4, page 158)

Surely this set him back for a while, but it did not slow him down. Surely there were other men like Vesalius, men who lived during the past 1000 years, who had suspected Galen of being wrong.

Yet Vesalius had access to something that none of those men had: the Gutenberg Printing Press.  It was invented in 1448 by Johannes Gutenberg, but by 1537 the press had become commonplace, and just about all great minds eager to publish a book had access to it.  Vesalius needed it big time in order to return medicine to western civilization.

Vesalius was hired as professor at the University of Padua in 1537 (3,4) and decided to dissect the bodies himself. His colleagues wondered why he would waste his time considering Galen had described the human body so perfectly. "Learning from dissecting is a waste of time," they said, "and all that was needed could be learned simply by opening up one of Galen's books." (3, page)

Yet Vesalius persisted, and he got his way.

Later that same year he becomes a medical doctor and was appointed to "lecturer-demonstrator" of anatomy and surgery.  From sun up to sun down, three days a week, he demonstrated and lectured about the human body in front of ever growing crowds of medical students.  (4, page 158)

To mark his independence from Galen, Vesalius arranged a public dissection lecture in which he demonstrated over 200 differences between the skeleton of apes and humans, while reminding his audience that "Galen's work is based on the dissection of apes."

His fellow professors, including his old instructor, cried foul.   Sylvius wrote letters explaining how crazy Vesaleas was, and even called him a "mad man." (2, page 159)

Yet despite their cries, Vesaleas was the one who laughed last.  He was the one who was noted to be correct by history. He was the one who became famous for his observation.  He was the one who became so popular that within a few years he would have enough money to hire an artist by the name of jan Stephen van Calcar to draw the human body as it was being dissected by him.  
Figure 4 -- Andreas Vesalius published the first accurate book of anatomy
on the printing press at Basle in 1543.  While the book in and of itself was
controversial, the title page shown here shows an engraving of
the teacher and his students examining a cadaver. (6, title page)

This book was published in the year 1543 in Basle when Vesalius was only 28.  This first accurate book of the human anatomy was called De Humani Corporuis Fabrica, or "The Fabric of the Human Body." It consisted of 700 pages, and the title page was an image consisting of the teacher and his students studying a cadaver (figure 4), which in itself must have been controversial.  (5, page 89)

This was a major scientific breakthrough, and the spark that would end the dark ages of medicine and the dawn of the scientific revolution.  From this point on human anatomy would be taught based on accurate pictures and descriptions, as opposed to Galen's ignorant descriptions. 

He continued to meet fierce opposition from his fellow professors with chants such as: "You are ruining our reputation!" They shouted such filth at him in the halls of the university he worked.  They accused him of crimes.  Many wrote books against Vesalius.

So, instead of completing more medical work, he spent the next 20 years fighting to get others to recognize the importance of the Fabric.

One can only imagine what such a great mind could have accomplished if he had been allowed to dedicate his time to performing more work, as opposed to defending his position.

This was just the way it was in the 16th century: statements of scientific fact did not come without a fight.

Yet it was a fight worth fighting. Thanks to the courageous acts of Vesaleas  the spark that was lit under the medical community grew into a full and flourishing flame within a few years.
Figure 5 --This engraving shows Vesalius displaying the muscular system
 of a human arm.  This was among many engravings displayed inside his
book that were created by jan Stephen van Calcar. 

Historians like John Hudson Tiner now recognize Vesaleas's discoveries about Galen's lies as one of the top ten most important medical discoveries of all time. Yet unfortunately Vesalius never lived to see its acceptance into modern medicine.  His later travels took him out of Europe and nothing is known about when nor how he died.

Although there are theories.  In his history of medicine, the father of modern medicine, William Henry Osler, explained one theory:  (2, page 160).
"The story is that he had obtained permission to perform a post-mortem examination on the body of a young Spanish nobleman, whom he had attended.  When the body was opened, the spectators to their horror saw the heart beating, and there were signs of life!  Accused, so it is said, by the Inquisition of murder and also of general impiety he only escaped through the intervention of the King, with the condition that he make a pilgrimage to the Holy Land.  In carrying this out in 1564 he was wrecked on the island of Zante, where he died of a fever or of exhaustion, in the fiftieth year of his life."
Regardless, Vesalius is a hero in every medical history. Actually, it wasn't Vesalius alone who saved medicine, as there is another hero in our story, and his name was Johannes Gutenberg.  Gutenberg provided the kindling, and Vesalius used it, figuratively speaking, to create a raging fire of knowledge.

Shortly after his death, ancient Greek medicine returned west, and was transcribed from Arabic back into western languages.  Yet along with the old wisdom came a plethora of new remedies and a young pharmaceutical profession. (5, page 75, 82)

References:
  1. The John Hopkins Hospital bulleton," (volume XV 1904), "from the epoch of the Alexandria School (300 B.C.)"
  2. Osler, William, "The Evolution of Modern Medicine: A series of lectures at Yale University on the Silliman Foundation in April, 1913," New Have, Yale University Press, 1921,
  3. Tiner, John Hudson, "Exploring the History of Medicine," (the conversation in this post is based on the writings of Tineralthough the actual words are made up by me). 
  4. Magner, Lois N, "A History of Medicine," page 160
  5. Bradford, Thomas Lindsley, writer, Robert Ray Roth, editor, “Quiz questions on the history of medicine from the lectures of Thomas Lindley Bradford M.D.,” 1898, Philadelphia, Hohn Joseph McVey
  6. Vesalius, Andreas, "De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libre Septem," 1555,
  7. Shute, D. Kerfoot, "The life and works of ndreas Vesalius," Old dominion journal of medicine and surgery, Tomkin, Beverly R. Tucker, Douglas Vanderhoof, Murat Willis, R.H. Wright, editors, 1910, Richmond Virginia, The Old Dominion Publishing Corporation, pages 195-211
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

1 A.D.: The first Dry Powdered Inhalers

Today we may think of the dry powder inhaler (DPI) as a relatively new concept. We often credit the Intal Spinhaler, first produced in the 1960s, as the first DPI. Yet we would be wrong. The first one was actually used in the ancient world.

In an 1876 book, John Solis Cohen said that Galen explained how the ancient physician Aesculapius blew "an astringent powder into the larynx by means of a bent reed" in patients who presented with angina, or chest pain. (1, page 336)

The medicines used were nutgall and myrrh.

So chances are pretty good other physicians in the ancient world relied on patients inhaling powders as remedies for various respiratory ailments (and probably other ailments too) all the way back to the beginning of civilization, and maybe even into the primitive world.

References:
  1. Cohen, John Solis, "Inhalation in the treatment of disease," 1876

Friday, October 30, 2015

1519: Cortes, Spaniards destroy American culture

The Spanish Conquistadors were known to keep their shoes on for several days, and rarely bathed. So they must have presented as rancid smelling people, compared to the natives they encountered in America.

The Aztec, the Inca and the Maya were known to bathe daily in the lakes and streams, and wash their faces and hands after meals. They even took steam bath as part of their healing and religious ceremonies. (Hakim) All of this must have really impressed upon the rancid smelling Spaniards. (Foster)

Given this picture, it's hard to picture in my mind how Montezuma, the king of the Aztec, could have possibly believed that Cortes was the god sent from the Heavens to save the Aztecs. You would think that if Cortes was an Aztec god, when he took off his shoes you would have found gold and silver, as opposed to maggots. Unfortunately Montezuma, in his utter surprise, was caught off guard. Instead of responding as the vigilance of the Alexander-the-Great-type warrior he was, he hesitated. And it was perhaps this brief hesitation that allowed Cortes the opportunity to destroy all that was left of the mighty Aztec civilization.

Since the materia medica contained religious content, even they were destroyed. This made it so historians had a tough time recreating the history of these great people. The Spaniards did such a good job of burning the contents of Mayan structures, that even to this day historians have trouble understanding their civilization, and why their great cities were abandoned in 1200 A.D. Lacking a Mayan Rosetta Stone, linguists still struggle to understand the Mayan language.

Surely the history of mankind is a history of wars, but the way the various civilizations of MesoAmerica met their demise is especially troubling, and sad. Yet that's the way it is (was).

The Spanish went through all the Aztec, Inca and Mayan structures and burned all that would burn, with the intent of replacing native American culture with their own. They went through all temples and burned the contents, including the medical documents. Where Aztec temples to the gods once stood, Catholic Churches were created. In the process, the Spaniards destroyed nearly all knowledge of the once mighty and proud native American civilizations.

Yet thankfully not even the Spaniards could destroy everything. Some documents did survive, including one book that has helped historians understand the health and healing process among the Maya. This book is called the "Ritual of the Bacads."

RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

1453: The world wakes up to science

Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
From about the time of Jesus to the Renaissance of the 16th century, there were few advances in medicine and science. The Greek terms asthma and dyspnea had made their way into the vocabularies of physicians, yet little was considered about their causes. Theories speculated air contained a life-giving substance, although what it contained was left to speculation.  That was all about to change. 

Up until this time the works of the famous Greco-Roman physician Claudius Galen of the 2nd century were considered the gold standard in medicine.  Science wasn't needed, because everything any physician could possibly need to know about any diseases and air was in one of Galen's books 
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

This started to change when the dark ages ended with the fall of Constantinople in 1453. This is believed by many historians to have ended the dark ages and sparked a Renaissance where lost Greek and Roman wisdom was recaptured.

It was in 1514 that Galen's reign as supreme master and god of medical superstitions took a major hit. This was the year Nicolaus Copernicus was questioning the belief that the Earth was the center of the Universe and started writing his theories about the earth rotating the sun. Out of fear of being rejected and maybe even killed, his works weren't published until eight years after his death in 1543.

This one event got many people to thinking, or, better yet, inspired thinkers to become courageous, thus gave birth to the age of reason, or the Renaissance. This was a time people started questioning the views that were etched in stone by the Ancient Greeks and followed through the Middle Ages.

This was a time of fresh ideas based on science as opposed to superstitions and false logic. New ideas were formed in physics, astronomy, biology, chemistry, alchemy and medicine.

Copernicus was the first to use scientific research as opposed to superstitions in science (at least he was the first to publish such results).

Perhaps among the most significant contributions to science came from Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), who in 1543 discovered that the planets revolve around the sun.  Out of fear of persecution, his works weren't published until after his death, although they had an astounding impact on other great minds, thus opening the door for the scientific revolution that followed.

Galileo Galileo was the first to oppose the Church during his lifetime. As a result Galileo became famous, and because of this he is now called the father of modern science.

In 1609 Galileo Galilee  (1564-1642) invented the telescope,  (1, page 255), and continued on to make astronomical observations that supported the works of Copernicus.  He had the courage to face the dogmatic Church, and published his works during his lifetime.  As a result, he was arrested for heresy and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.  His energy, courage and sacrifices, however, made him a significant player in the scientific revolution.  By history, he is considered among the fathers of modern physics and science.

Fielding Hudson Garrison, in his book "Introduction to the history of medicine," said that the works of investigators such as Copernicus and Galileo, and other such great men, also had an impact on medicine.  For example, in 1600 Galileo invented a "rude thermometer or thermoscope, and as early as 1600 (Johannes) Kepler had used pulse-counting to time his astronomic observations."  (1, page 258)

Surely investigators studied the stars and planets, they also studied plants, animals and humans, learning much about anatomy, how life is created and sustained, and about diseases.  Also investigated was the air we breathe, and its relationship with the sustenance of life.

Thanks to these two men, over the next few hundred years diseases like asthma would be better understood, and theories about air and the purpose of breathing would be proven false and replaced with scientific fact.

References:
  1. Garrison, Fielding Hudson, "Introduction to the history of medicine," 1921, 
RT Cave Facebook Page
RT Cave on Twitter
Print Friendly and PDF